I didn't think there would be a whole bunch of community here, so I thought, okay, right,
but it's nothing we can present at the fall stamp, because fall stamp is more for hackers.
The most, my believing, but I see the room is quite crowded, so I am happy to explain a little
bit what we did at the SPB, especially what I did for the past five years, with my team,
it was not myself, so we need a team to work on that.
Okay, try to loud and louder.
Okay, the motivation behind this planning tool is we have to plan much, much more than you can
believe, so we show in the past talk that there will be data, a lot of data, complicated data,
microscopic data, and a lot of data, but without planning, we never get to data, so the planning process,
you'll see you can get to data there, but the planning process is a long, it's already a long, long
planning process, even after you have to plan 20, 30 years or so head, so we know, no dice, we plan
with this tool, the timetable for we are 56, it's the 2006, why that, so if we change the offer,
what's going on? Okay, let's slide in like something. Okay, we have to plan ahead a lot,
the problem is we have a well-change infrastructure, so we have a fixed infrastructure,
we can do some offers on that, we can run percentage trends and try trends, but if we need more
percentage trends, or more fried trends in the same time, we don't have the infrastructure,
and to build and construct the infrastructure, we need time, you cannot build the infrastructure,
you can build software, you can make a better schedule on the given infrastructure, because the
trends are more or less a dynamic process, but if you need really need more switches, more tracks,
the unique constructions, and if you see Switzerland is very dense, so we have many buildings,
we cannot build any tracks where we want, then we need plan and so on, and this makes the whole thing
really complex, and the question is how to support the plan with a tool, you will see what they
have until they got the next slide, we need to have a tool that can work easily with,
because their key work is not the software, their work is the planning, and one important thing
is the structure in the traffic and then in the rival traffic in Switzerland, it repeats each hour,
so it means we just plan one system hour, one hour, and then we just hope it, that's easy,
then you can hope it, if you can run the thing in one hour perfectly, then you just hope it,
then the next hour is the same, then as well for the percentage spread, if you attack the
trim, the trick to Geneva, it depart 0, 4, a trick or a Geneva, then you now next hour will
be the same, try 4, so 1, 4, 2, 4, 3, 4, it's really easy to say, okay, I want to attack the
trend one hour later, but the trade process is the same, what they do during planning,
just before we introduce this planning tool, they just plan on such right ports, they make workshops,
they plan, they make variants, they discuss, they plan the paper, they discuss and they
let's go on, and once they have one idea, maybe it is, this variant is not good, it's not good,
we don't know here, it's just an example of course, but this one is exactly what we want to get,
they took that, took another software, they entered the data and after some
work in the ice, they got out, doesn't work because we didn't watch that, so we introduced a planning
software, where is like a tumor, it is the design system, you can plan us, they do in the buildings,
a construction, then they can just click, they want to get inside, buy some data because they
manage to enter the data in a really efficient way, and so on, so you see, planning, you give
the tool, they can interact it, it must be easy, because the planning just won't use a tool
which is easy to use, five years ago, we talked to them, I was in this workshop, I couldn't
believe that this is the state of the art, this could be the site, this is okay, they cannot be
a bike to work, and then the first question, what is the topic of the tool and the answer to
me, it must be as easy as on whiteboard, I was shocked, and my UX I actually took the idea as well,
a UX actually involved, it told me, oh no problem, I forgot that you can do analytics on it,
if they have a tool, which might take an essential process, you can copy paste, you can
have much more time, so you see it often is a problem in the world, you have to transfer,
make into your world, and then you need scale software, developers, UX design, and so on,
because the tool must be really easy to use, and we started it in like this and workshop
on paper, as well as paper, yeah, we talked about paper, but we discussed the paper, we
normally work, we make a short design sprint, like works that more, so we have to understand
the problem, we make a scale software for one problem, then we take a decision, then make my
rapid prototypes on the test with the user, and once we say okay this is the way to go,
then we start the really hard development process, which takes a lot of more time, quick and
dirty is easy to get, but then it's the work we have to do for a product, as well user feedback,
you might kind of laid it off the work, but one thing is key is one, the big one, one user
gave the feedback, what must be careful not to integrate too many features,
as the tool might become already complex and complicated, I think this is key, you have to
take in all the projects where the user has to do a creative work, a planning is a creative work,
because there is not just one solution, we have many solutions, then it's easy that the user can
easily use the software, and the software is not a new problem for him, it has another problem to solve.
I just have a video animation, I hope it can give a two minute live demonstration of the tool,
you can scan this QR code, and you've got a running tool, unfortunately it's not yet
easy to use on the mobile phone, you might better use it on the computer, because yeah,
unfortunately it doesn't work, it's one thing you can contribute, how it would we easily
do get placed on any cello phones, so as a switch, I hope it's working, though this is a demonstration
tool, so it's intractive tool, one thing is as well interesting, you can put two data, this is
bad through it, tap, you see, as well, algorithms, and something you can see is we need software
developers, skills of the robots on the graphical, user interface, interactive designers to get
a really nice thing that we need experts in algorithms, because it's not so easy to snap
a phone, you can contribute as UX designer, graphics expert, and then you might just click,
then say, okay, I don't need that, or no, there was no that one, okay, back and so on,
we can trust, say, okay, new line from here to here, okay, this is back and then I don't have
internet, but this is not a problem, just a bad message, so you have a new line, this is exactly
about what I told before, new line means construction, construction means a lot of money doing
the best, that's really expensive, my here is a big mountain, then you, all right, all right,
yeah, okay, you say, can we all do that, and again, okay, it's not a good way to do
like that, so we can trust, say, okay, we might like this, and that's it, and so on,
you see, there's an interactive tool, is it a use, I love it now, they're using that,
they raise the paper, they don't buy paper anymore, it's nice for the environment,
so, and what we did, we showed this tool, the other companies, private companies,
and I thought, okay, that's nice, and how can we get that, and this is a really big deal in our
company, we decide going open source, the way of open source, we are not using tools, open source,
there's a business software, open source, might we have some libraries still in open source,
but this is a big deal, so culture change, actually we had the concept of buy,
built, as before, buy, have before built, be by then, we couldn't buy that, so we have to build it,
build by our own, we start like this, cost a lot of money, other, other companies might
the same thing again, and the different, but the same thing, so the question is how we can make
cultural transfer in the company, from built share and profit, if we have to build, of course,
if we can buy, we buy, it's more expensive, it's more, so let's complicated for a company like us,
but if we need to build share and profit, from the contributions of the, yeah, of the other
companies, it can be a really interesting thing, so what we did, April 24, right, yeah,
24 Peter, and it was, and we just started in January, one year ago, with SNCF, because SNCF,
okay we have developers, we have the problem, we have another project we will hear about
of the desktop, we start with SNCF, and this is one thing we can recommend if you do that in
the company, start small, make the open source area just between two companies, then you can learn,
you find the thing you would not better make public as public, the other company you can trust,
the world might, you can also well trust, but better not trust everything, what you put it,
then you can clean up, and then I believe it will make it public, and now you can just go to
the key top, you can download it, you can install it, you can work with it, really nice, so here is
the model, get started in five minutes, it works on your local system, right, right, really not
the story and because we have forgotten one skill person, we don't have, they don't have the skill,
the plan that doesn't can, they don't have the skill to install that, so what we might,
in the same time, we might the running system, the demonstrated you can have public,
and we have now connected the developer community, which has the skill to make the development,
and we have connected them with the end user community, and they have another idea, they have
resources for requests, they request features, they also have kind of request features,
and so we have now the full potential realized in a bigger community, so I think, make it open,
is the first step, but fairly accessible application is as well, really important,
and then you can bring the community and attention, is what you get out of that, and this is much more
power, and now this is what we have, we trust you, the open source tools, it's still the next
movie, we have tiktok.spb.shm, this is the digital application system, so the design patterns
we used as well public, these are used tools, then we have the Angular app,
dotspb.shm, which is the basic of the tool, and we just built that tool, based on this,
two or three different open source projects we still have, so this is the first business
software, I want to say it is the right, the worst business software we make open source,
normally the story, and at the base library, the Angular, technical stuff, now we have the
software as well, released. We have an open question, might you can support us,
answer them again, one thing is how we can use the design patterns, use the interaction patterns,
and so on for other project, or we can make more accessible and we can get as well these
community approach on the design level of the pad, and the other one is how we can avoid
pork, so every company who is using the tool has made different feature requests, and we
as SBB, we are not interested in having a different forks, so we want to have one application,
we like to benefit from all different contributions, but they have to fit into one stream in
one application, and the question is how to avoid that, that's something we have to work out
in the next few months, and the most important page is this one, I want to say it is easy to use,
it is easy to start, and I hope you can use that, make a story, if you think this project is
pretty nice, make a story, I'll have to get in the march of stars, and the most important thing
is not getting stars, the most important thing is getting use kills in the project to improve
the project over the next few years or a month. If you have any questions, I'm here, just ask
questions, and Peter is happy, I think the time is not so bad, yeah, I think that by this
beginning you are using this yellow and blue, and I would like to ask you how to create this new
course, and the two of the ones, because I believe that field will get all of whatever to make
it, we realize that more or less on the field to level, we don't need that, but if you have to
just catch up your hours, weeks faster, because you can, during this catch up tool, you just
throw, you just drop the microwave to the discussed that, you can exchange that, then you can't
get inside, you might get, you draw, just to align, and you have to answer all of well that
the notes, the details, the mesoscopic detail, I don't want to say, and then you make a
projection of it, and you see this in the distance, time drop, you see exactly how many,
you see, I can show that in a few seconds, that this is one thing, it's really interesting for
the planets, you might just get, and here up, this is an estimate, how is the track line looking
like with the spine, so we have a horrific implemented method, this is not precise, and in the
videocto, you have to enter everything, then you have a really precise plan, but this takes a lot
more time, and for early design, like all of us I have a variant studies, is this too much more
accurate, but the other tool is, of course, is for all the questions better, so this is
early stage, then we have to really add on the funnel, we have to team assist in this
our system where we do then operative planning, and then the data goes out, and you can use
us well the data.
It's important to differentiate between a macro and a micro level of detail, okay, thanks a lot
bye guys