Let's start with history.
Quantum computing is built on quantum mechanics.
In 1925, about 100 years ago, 50 sisters such as Hazenberg,
Scheringer and Dirac formulated the mathematical foundation
of the microscopic world.
In 1981, Richard Feynman realized that if we want to generate an nature,
we need a massing that is a quantum.
A few years later, David Deutsche,
homeralized this into the concept of a universal quantum computing.
Universal quantum computer is a data-based system,
capable of any computation,
defining the standard for the modern quantum computer.
The transition to reality, or hardware,
was led by pioneers like Yasnovu Nakamura,
who achieved the world's first superconducting cube in 1999.
A major shift occurred around 2014,
when John Malchines teams achieved high-fidelity quantum games.
Then, in 2016, IBM launched the first quantum processor
on the cloud, making the hardware accessible to everyone.
This opened a door for some sort of associative robust
like S to enter the field.
To understand what quantum computing is,
we must understand the cute.
Unlike a classical bit-fetchy is a deterministic zero or one,
a cube that exists in a superposition,
a complex combination of both states simultaneously.
We also utilize an entanglement,
a deep correlation where the state of one cube
is in standard influences,
another regardless of distance.
Mathematical, we will prevent this as a vector on the Brooks sphere.
The Brooks sphere is a 3D geometric model used to be
derived mathematical state of the single cube.
Why is quantum quantum better than classical computer?
It is not easy to discuss that in details here.
There are many discussions about the dystopic.
But L cubits living to the end dimension of Hilbert space.
So, with just 300 cubits,
the state space is larger than all atoms in the over the other universe.
Cubits can all the possibility in this huge space.
But however, the harsh reality that cubits are very fragile.
They suffer from low fidelity and environmental noise.
Unlike ideal math,
we are how it does not work as predicted.
So, what is this massing actually for?
It is important to clarify.
It is not the first version of your laptop.
It is a tool for combinatorial complexity.
Any problem where the possibilities grow exponentially
is targeted for quantum.
In quantum chemistry, we can simulate nitrogen,
fixation for grain of fat levels.
Logistics with global optimization problem at the scale of classical computer
can't touch.
And in security,
this famous shows our algorithm.
It is famous because it can solve large scale prime factorization
at high speeds.
To build these math,
we use microscopic systems like artificial atoms in circuits.
In principle, any physical system that
obeys quantum mechanics can solve as quantum computing devise.
Among the superconducting cubits,
as a very leading candidate.
This iconic structure is the golden shandelier.
Additionally, refrigerator that cools down
hardware to semi-calming,
colder than the outer space to protect fragile quantum states.
Looking at this,
we are in the back end tube area of quantum.
Like an egg, colossus,
it is bulky, delicate,
and require a massive infrastructure.
The core challenge today is that the landscape is dominated
by a closer existence.
That comes like IBM and Google of a powerful world of gardens.
This leads to vendor-locking and lack of transparency for researchers,
who want to see how their quantum sets are optimized.
There is no standardized open operating system
that allows independent operators to build their own quantum cloud.
This is the world we intended to break.
So we are making octopuses.
Sorry, we are making octopuses.
The open quantum source chain
for operators and users.
Our goal is simple
to democratize the quantum stack.
This is a major junk effort between OSAT and university.
We can put it to sick and TIS,
this Japanese company.
We are building an open infrastructure
that is not tied to a single vendor,
allowing the community to inspect,
improve and innovate.
Our architecture is a three-layer stack.
Layer winds are front-end for user programming.
Layer 2 is the cloud layer for job management on scaling.
And layer 3 is the back end layer.
How do we control it?
By splitting this concept, we can provide
stable environment for users
who are handling the chaos of experiment
how do we as in the background.
Layer 1 is the front-end.
The entry point for our users
I have not expressed the defined data.
This is basically a sequence of quantum gates,
much like logical operations in classical computing.
That's a manipulate the states of students.
In octobus, these circuits are represented by open-casm.
Open-casm is this problem.
It's a defect standard for describing quantum circuits,
made by IBM.
Yeah, our front-end provider, both web UI
or visual design and SDK for programmatic access
learning researchers to build a complex quantum logic
without worrying about the hardware specific pass control.
It won't be nice.
The cloud layer is orchestrating.
It features an intuitive router based dashboard
for real-time job monitoring.
Users can visually compose the circuits,
submit them, and track their progress in Stanford.
After trying abstracting a way that
low-level complexity or pass control.
A pass control is
refers to the precise micro-web signals
is to physically manipulate the qubit.
And the back-end layer, the octobus engine.
The octobus engine handles transpilation.
It delights abstracts to match the specific physical
topology of the superconducting chip.
Beneath the engine, device gateway translate
these instructions into precise micro-web parts.
This layer is also where we implement error mitigation.
To fight the noise, we discussed earlier,
ensuring the best possible results from noisy, noisy,
noisy hardware.
In March 2023,
Japan, which is a strict milestone
which will be the launch of its first domestic
64 qubit massing at a weekend.
This effort quickly expanded into a national infrastructure
including the old Japanese system at Otsaka University.
We also joined the AISP.
The national institute of advanced industrial
science and technology, in Japan,
did the first massive issue that
researchers and the industry patterns
can access Japan's national quantum assets
reliably and secure.
Why does open source matters to
so much for the future of quantum?
It is a transparency of avoiding the blocking.
In science, we must be able to verify
results by inspecting the comparacles
in August 2025.
The Linux professional institute, LPI blog,
featured octobus in their blog.
They highlighted how open source communities
are tackling the unique hardware specific
challenge of quantum computing.
Being recognized by the global Linux community
as a learning example of international cooperation
is a milestone for us.
The LPI article suggests
your expertise as OSS developers
is exactly exactly what we need to
be the next Linux for quantum.
We are building the commingitory-bomb ecosystem
that anyone can verify, improve and innovate.
Okay.
To conclude, the future of quantum must be open.
Octopus is already a reality
powering the national research infrastructure
at weekend and Ossaka University today.
It will need a daily dilution refrigerator
to start.
Please visit our public website.
There's a here.
There's a website.
Right now, I'm going to try it yourself.
We are building the Linux content.
We want you to be a part of it
with our GitHub reports.
We're just playing with the demo.
We published a guide paper
about Octopus which explains our system
in detail.
Okay.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.
We have time for a couple of questions.
We have, let's say,
three minutes if there are questions from the government.
And there are plans to support the program.
And we're just other than other things.
Excuse me.
Sorry.
Are there any plans for my work?
Are there other plans for my work?
Yeah, yeah.
Can you please repeat to put that?
Yes.
He asks the opportunity to support other language.
Other quantum sector language.
Okay.
Yeah.
We are planning.
And there are many quantum,
quantum presentations.
Like QAR.
Yeah.
QAR is made by Microsoft's.
Yeah.
We are planning.
Yeah.
Okay.
Are you planning to support
other quantum buttons?
Other than the spectrum back in the weeks.
Why do you do that?
Yeah.
The question is,
are we planning to other quantum devices?
Like eunthrops?
Or,
eunthrops?
Eunthrops?
Yeah.
We also can University have
a level of triple eunthrop.
So, so, so.
We are connecting them to, yeah.
This to octopus.
Yeah.
That's me.
If you come through,
you have a physical type of integration between the,
like, a special and a quantum system.
Right now, you're confused about the quantum system.
When you change the notes, you have no idea.
A vision for the computer,
a computing system, has this thing in relation to the interesting quantum system.
Aye.
Okay.
The question is, are we planning to connect the system to HPC?
Yeah, yeah, yeah, we are planning.
Yeah, yeah.
HPC on the QPU collaboration is a very popular now.
So, we have projects to connect the system to HPC now.
Thanks.
Thank you.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.